Il nostro è un Paese densamente popolato e ad altà sismicità. Il crollo della gabbia di contenimento del reattore della centrale nucleare di Fukushima colpisce noi italiani anche al di là di fervida solidarietà umana. Colpisce perché è avvenuto in un Paese ad alta sismicità, che contro tali eventi si è da tempo attrezzato in modo ammirevole (lo comprova la tenuta delle città alle scosse fortissime). Colpisce perché questa Italia, il cui governo di centrodestra ha imboccato nuovamente la strada del nucleare, dimenticando sbrigativamente il “no” referendario del 1987, è anch’essa sovente percossa da terremoti importanti contro i quali si è messo in sicurezza poco più del 20 per cento del patrimonio edilizio.Fra le nostre regioni ne abbiamo soltanto una asismica, la Sardegna, a cui va aggiunta la catena delle Alpi (ma non delle Prealpi, come i mille morti del Friuli ci ricordano).
E’ uno dei motivi per cui si sconsiglia il ritorno al nucleare. Add to this, even though Italy is a densely populated area - apart from the Apennine ridge, however, almost all highly desertified and seismic Madonie from the North - and that some of the sites "likely" are not far from areas affected by strong earthquakes: Montalto di Castro Lazio Maremma is a few kilometers from Tuscania partially destroyed in 1971 with 34 deaths. Montalto but no longer appears, for some reason, between the towns earthquakes. Since the disaster of Fukushima referendum against nuclear IDV then draw a significant boost. As it was in '87 after Cernobyl.Vi are also scientists, I think the physicist Carlo Bernardini, fully favorable to nuclear power instead. They claim that the Chernobyl plant was obsolete and of a type prohibited in the West, remember that the accident at Three Mile Island in the United States did not victims, state that the French EPR are reliable, and that uranium, when it is spent (in 40 years?) may be obtained from the sea as they do the Japanese, while the waste is too dramatized the disposal or concealment. In any case, only nuclear power can save us from high oil prices which tap is in the hands of countries like Libya.
In contrast, the Nobel laureate Carlo Rubbia should strengthen research on the centrality of the fourth generation - those of thorium, mineral, and that we possess, burning, leaves little waste - covering the period of welding with renewable energy, especially that solare.Un another great scientist, the chemist Vincenzo Balzani, Accademia dei Lincei, points out that nuclear power now provides only 15 percent of electricity worldwide in the coming years and that nuclear power stations will be decommissioned three times more of those assets, so that these are not expensive to be built by private parties (in France are in charge of Defence), require at least ten years, subject to delays, as in Finland. In addition, security issues (Japan confirmation) is not solved, nor that of the slag. "A good puzzle," admitted a "guru" of nuclear, Richard Garwin. Then there's the border, very tenuous, among civil nuclear power and nuclear military.
issues: energy in Italy is too expensive. Because of oil? In parte.Molto more because our producers are few and "make the sign" keeping prices high. The defect usually oligopolistic Italian companies against whom he fought decades ago, Luigi Einaudi.
0 comments:
Post a Comment